Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Role of gapy, list of per...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: yoss
04-25-2025, 01:41 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 11,448
|
Pulp - make build
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: tomkathy
04-09-2025, 07:58 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,516
|
Cheshire with two cores
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: antp
04-07-2025, 10:35 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,266
|
missing package in pulp-s...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: yoss
03-27-2025, 04:07 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 271
|
Unable to compile and run...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: victorgervasio
03-25-2025, 09:30 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 577
|
__builtin_pulp
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: yoss
02-18-2025, 04:31 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 391
|
XpulpNN march
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: yoss
02-06-2025, 12:47 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 896
|
Help with llvm/clang comp...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: ThomasMuyal
01-23-2025, 10:10 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,382
|
Doubts regarding I2S mode...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Zyb
01-09-2025, 11:56 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 533
|
Multi Core PULP first tim...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
01-02-2025, 02:23 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,499
|
|
|
Pulpissimo on FPGA |
Posted by: skor - 04-09-2019, 12:28 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello,
I have been trying to Synthesize and implement Pulpissimo on Xilinx FPGA using Vivado . There are problems in the syntesized design although elaborated design seems to be Okay. Have you synthesised Pulpissimo using VIvado and if yes then did you have to do changes to the RTL?
My synthesis basically is completed succesfully, but when I look at the synthesised schematics I can see that for example zynq_clk_i is not connected anywhere, although it should go to ref_clk_i in soc_domain.
Regards, Sirpa
|
|
|
Coremark for benchmarking 8 core PULP |
Posted by: Athena - 03-28-2019, 01:39 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hello,
I want to benchmark the performance of the 8 core multicore platform PULP. The current coremark example in pulp-rt-examples needs to be modified to be able to run it on PULP such that it uses the 8 cores of the cluster. Can a guideline be provided to modify the Coremark benchmark for the PULP platform.
Regards,
Athena
|
|
|
FPGA JTAG-cable and debugger sw |
Posted by: Akim - 03-28-2019, 11:45 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (5)
|
 |
Hello,
We have bought couple of Genesys2 FPGA boards. We are going to use the Pulpissimo for that.
We would like to flash the test software to it and also if possible use some debugging software via JTAG.
Do you have any suggestion to use as JTAG-cable or debugging software, that you are going to support?
Do I need to use Genesys2 PMOD connectors to connect JTAG-cable or do you have any solid solutions for that?
If understood correctly debugging software is going to need OpenOCD support and that is coming Q2/2019 for Pulpissimo. Right?
Br,
Akim
|
|
|
Post-synthesis simulation for pulp |
Posted by: Athena - 03-07-2019, 02:37 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello,
I have synthesised a particular IP of the pulp system for ASIC using a certain compiler. Now I want to re-insert the synthesised netlist into the system and perform a post-synthesis simulation for verification. How do I go about with this?
From what I understand, when a certain simulation for say hello example (given under pulp-rt-examples) is run, all the IPS are being fetched directly from the git-hub repository instead from the locally cloned repository IP folder. Is my understanding correct?
How do I add my own changes to the exisiting IP and still run an example simulation ?
Thanks!
Regards,
Athena
|
|
|
PULP-SDK build not working |
Posted by: MikkeN - 02-21-2019, 11:24 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hi,
is there a bug in latest PULP-SDK make script?
When I am entering: make -all
it gives an error after running a while
sdk:pulp-rt:build (pulpissimo@config_file=chips/pulpissimo/pulpissimo.json): make build install
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/runtime/pulp-rt'
plpflags gen --output-dir=/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/build/sdk/pulp-rt/pulpissimo --makefile=/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/build/sdk/pulp-rt/pulpissimo/config.mk --property=fc/archi --property=pe/archi --property=pulp_chip --property=pulp_chip_family --property=soc/cluster --property=host/archi --property=fc_itc --property=udma/hyper --property=udma --property=udma/cpi --property=udma/i2c/version --property=soc/fll --property=udma/i2s/version --property=udma/uart --property=event_unit/version --property=perf_counters --property=fll/version --property=soc/spi_master --property=soc/apb_uart --property=padframe/version --property=udma/spim --property=udma/spim/version --property=gpio/version --property=rtc --property=udma/archi --property=soc_eu/version --property=compiler --property=rtc/version --lib=rt --lib=omp --lib=rtio --lib=bench
plpconf --input=pulpissimo@config_file=chips/pulpissimo/pulpissimo.json --config=platform=rtl --config=**/rt/type=pulp-rt --output=/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/build/sdk/pulp-rt/pulpissimo/config.json
/home/mijuna/riscv-gnu-toolchain/bin/riscv32-unknown-elf-gcc -march=rv32imfcxpulpv2 -mfdiv -D__riscv__ -D__RT_USE_IO=1 -Os -g -fno-jump-tables -Werror -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wextra -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused-function -Wundef -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -I/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/pkg/sdk/dev/install/include/io -I/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/pkg/sdk/dev/install/include -include /home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/build/sdk/pulp-rt/pulpissimo/fc_config.h -MMD -MP -c kernel/init.c -o /home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/build/sdk/pulp-rt/pulpissimo/rt/fc/kernel/init.o
cc1: error: -march=rv32imfcxpulpv2: unsupported ISA substring 'xpulpv2'
make[1]: *** [/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/build/sdk/pulp-rt/pulpissimo/rt/fc/kernel/init.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mijuna/pulp-sdk/runtime/pulp-rt'
Reached EOF with exit status 2
FATAL ERROR: the command 'build' has failed
make: *** [all] Error 255
|
|
|
Synthesis 8 core pulp for ASIC |
Posted by: Athena - 02-11-2019, 04:41 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hello !
I want to synthesis the pulp SoC for 65 nm ASIC technology. Given that I have the Synopsys Compiler available is there a guide as to how proper synthesis of the pulp (with 8 RI5CY) cores can be carried out on the such that the hierarchy of the system is properly maintained during optimizations.
Is there some example script available to direct the Synopsys compiler (or some other compiler) to perform proper synthesis.
The final goal is to be able to perform power measurements on the synthesised design. Also, is this power analysis possible with the given repository of the pulp project on github?
|
|
|
Error in build of Pulpissimo RTL platform |
Posted by: idoraz - 02-09-2019, 01:17 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello,
We installed the SDK and the toolchain on our Linux server and have QuestaSim-64 v10.0c
installed.
When trying to generate the PULPissimo RTL platform I am getting the following error message during the build 'phase':
** Error: ../ips/common_cells/src/stream_mux.sv(18): near "localparam": syntax error, unexpected localparam
** Error: ../ips/common_cells/src/stream_demux.sv(20): near "localparam": syntax error, unexpected localparam
** Error: ../ips/common_cells/src/popcount.sv(21): near "localparam": syntax error, unexpected localparam
make[2]: *** [modelsim_libs/common_cells_lib/common_cells_all.vmake] Error 2
make[1]: *** [build] Error 2
make: *** [build] Error 2
Do you have any clue what can be the reason for this error?
Thanks,
Ido
|
|
|
Benchmarking using Coremark |
Posted by: Athena - 02-05-2019, 02:06 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- No Replies
|
 |
On the github platform for PULP, under pulp-rt-examples repository the coremark benchmark has been given.
This benchmark runs for platforms like the single-core platform PULPissimo as well as the PULP (8 core platform).
However, in both cases I have inferred that the platforms are running at a frequency of 100 MHz.
For instance this is the output obtained for the Pulpissimo with zero riscy core:
[TB] 30495473188 - Triggering fetch enable
# [TRACER] Output filename is: trace_core_1f_0.log
# [dbg_if_soc] WRITE32 burst @1a104008 for 4 bytes.
# [TB] 30509373188 - Waiting for end of computation
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] 2K performance run parameters for coremark.
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] CoreMark Size : 666
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Total ticks : 535261
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Total time (usecs): 5352
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Iterations/Sec : 186
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] ERROR! Must execute for at least 10 secs for a valid result!
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Iterations : 1
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Compiler version : na
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Compiler flags : na
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Memory location : STATIC
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] seedcrc : 0xe9f5
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] [0]crclist : 0xe714
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] [0]crcmatrix : 0x1fd7
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] [0]crcstate : 0x8e3a
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] [0]crcfinal : 0xe714
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] Correct operation validated. See README.md for run and reporting rules.
# [STDOUT-CL31_PE0] CoreMark 1.0 : 186 / na na / STATIC
# [TB] 45796773188 - Received status core: 0x00000000
# ** Note: $stop : /home/ashwini/pulp-sdk/pulpissimo-master/sim/../rtl/tb/tb_pulp.sv(679)
# Time: 45796773188 ps Iteration: 0 Instance: /tb_pulp
# Break at /home/ashwini/pulp-sdk/pulpissimo-master/sim/../rtl/tb/tb_pulp.sv line 679
# Stopped at /home/ashwini/pulp-sdk/pulpissimo-master/sim/../rtl/tb/tb_pulp.sv line 679
# End time: 14:51:20 on Feb 05,2019, Elapsed time: 0:05:38
# Errors: 0, Warnings: 15
From the total time taken and the total ticks fields, it can be deduced that the platform is running at a speed of 100 MHz.
How was this frequency chosen?
Also, is there a way to change this frequency from the coremark.patch file (or any other file for that matter) that has been given with the coremark folder under pulp-rt-examples.
Another interesting result of running the coremark example was that I obatined the same performance numbers (as listed above) for PULP and PULPissimo (with RISCY core). Does this mean that when coremark is running on PULP it is just giving the performance number of the core and the not the entire architecture? or How to interpret these values after running the coremark. Is it only evaluating the performance of a single core regardless of the platform?
|
|
|
Error Linux Cross Compiler |
Posted by: Athena - 01-28-2019, 09:57 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hello!
While following the instructions to install the RISC-V GNU compiler as listed here :https://github.com/pulp-platform/pulp-riscv-gnu-toolchain.
I installation for the linux cross compiler is failing.
On running this command on the terminal:
Code: ./configure --prefix=/opt/riscv --with-arch=rv32g --with-abi=ilp32d
make linux
I get the error message saying:
/include/atomic.h:826:3: error: #error ATOMIC_EXCHANGE_USES_CAS has to be defined.
I have attached a screenshot showing the error with this post.
Is there any fix for this? or Am I doing something wrong?
I am running this on Ubuntu 18.04 and I have set the gcc version to 5. Also, the Newlib compilation is performed successfully.
|
|
|
|