Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
i have some issue with si...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Garrett Gay
Yesterday, 08:56 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 876
|
How to get more detailed ...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Santuckley
Yesterday, 06:48 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 412
|
Some questions.
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: sungyong
11-12-2024, 03:31 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 58
|
what is meaning of ARA? (...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: sungyong
11-12-2024, 01:17 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 150
|
librbs.so not found (Pulp...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: bluewww
11-07-2024, 01:57 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 160
|
Fatal error: Broken assem...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Roogadget
10-31-2024, 03:12 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 355
|
Cheshire with two cores
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
10-30-2024, 11:14 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 191
|
mno pulp hwloop error
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
10-30-2024, 09:19 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 670
|
Pulp - make build
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Roogadget
10-25-2024, 07:33 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 207
|
CV32E40P/RI5CY Setup
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
10-25-2024, 07:13 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 294
|
|
|
PULPino Boot ROM Address problem |
Posted by: Jay Huang - 11-30-2023, 03:28 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
Hi, I am Jay Huang, a Verification Engineer at Taiwan Electronic System Design Automation (TESDA). Currently, we are utilizing your open-source SOC, PULPino, to develop our verification tools.
During the course of our SOC implementation, we have encountered some challenges related to the PULPino Boot ROM, prompting us to seek clarification on certain aspects. According to the datasheet Memory Map, the Boot ROM's address range is specified as 0x0008_0000 to 0x0008_0200.
In an attempt to integrate this information into our testbench, I observed that when attempting to read from this address range, no data was retrieved. After further investigation, it was determined that the Boot ROM is, in fact, located immediately following the Instruction Memory, rather than at the specified address.
I would like to ask if it is correct to set the start address of the Boot ROM at 0x0000_8000 if the Instruction Memory is configured as 32KB?
If this configuration is indeed correct, I am curious as to why the Boot ROM's address in the datasheet is documented as 0x0008_0000 to 0x0008_0200.
Your insights and guidance on this matter would be immensely valuable to us in resolving the issues we are currently facing. Thank you for your time and attention to this inquiry.
|
|
|
Changing Pulpissimo core to cv32e40s |
Posted by: ivanhira - 11-21-2023, 07:39 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
Hi,
I was trying to implement a solution to add AES and maybe other crypto extensions in Pulpissimo. I tried to change the core to a variant of the RI5CY, CV32E40S that support some of that extensions.
When I run a test that worked on the original core, the JTAG halts the core in the simulation.
I was wondering if there is something to do with the SDK (by the way, i'm using this platform for a while so i'm still using releases 7.0 and pulp-sdk) or the toolchain to make it work, or is it just a problem in the connection of the core. There are quite a few more ports so, just to start trying, I left some of the ports that seemed optional from the documentation.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Pulpino without PS |
Posted by: istillaga - 11-20-2023, 08:52 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
Hello,
I am trying to generate pulpino's bitstream without using the processing system loading the programs via SPI SLAVE. I modified the pulpemu folder deleting all the processing system's part and I managed to generate the bitstream but I am getting this warnings:
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPIP-1) Input pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/__0 input A B is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 input will improve performance.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPIP-1) Input pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/__0__0 input A B is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 input will improve performance.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPIP-1) Input pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/__1 input B is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 input will improve performance.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPIP-1) Input pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/short_mac input A B C is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 input will improve performance.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPIP-1) Input pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/short_mul input A B is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 input will improve performance.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPIP-1) Input pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/p_0_out input A B is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 input will improve performance.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPOP-1) Output pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/__0 output P is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 output will improve performance. Both multiplier/adder output can be pipelined.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPOP-1) Output pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/__0__0 output P is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 output will improve performance. Both multiplier/adder output can be pipelined.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPOP-1) Output pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/__1 output P is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 output will improve performance. Both multiplier/adder output can be pipelined.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPOP-1) Output pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/short_mac output P is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 output will improve performance. Both multiplier/adder output can be pipelined.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPOP-1) Output pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/mult_i/short_mul output P is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 output will improve performance. Both multiplier/adder output can be pipelined.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (DPOP-1) Output pipelining - DSP u_pulpino/pulpino_i/core_region_i/CORE.RISCV_CORE/ex_stage_i/p_0_out output P is not pipelined. Pipelining DSP48 output will improve performance. Both multiplier/adder output can be pipelined.
WARNING: [DRC 23-20] Rule violation (ZPS7-1) PS7 block required - The PS7 cell must be used in this Zynq design in order to enable correct default configuration.
Then with Vivado I transfer the bitstream to the zedboard and send the code to load the program via SPI SLAVE but I don't get any answer from MISO and it doesn't load the program.
Any help?
|
|
|
Pulp FreeRTOs Debug |
Posted by: costola - 10-24-2023, 10:14 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (2)
|
|
I am running a project with pulp-freertos and all the related tools needed to make it run (sdk and riscv toolchain). I am personalizing the 'blink' demo project already present in the github dir project, but I need to debug it. Now the question is...how can I debug it?
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
SPI Master |
Posted by: istillaga - 10-19-2023, 08:34 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hello i'm using Pulpino's SPI Master part to read a external sensor that it is connected to one of the zedboard's pmod. I have configurated the spi_master_clkgen spi_clk polarity to start in 1. I have done the next code to read the sensor's id but I don't get any success:
#include <utils.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <spi.h>
#include <bench.h>
int main() {
int sensor_id;
spi_setup_master(1);
*(volatile int*) (SPI_REG_CLKDIV) = 0x2;
spi_setup_cmd_addr( 0x0f, 8,0,0);
spi_set_datalen(8);
spi_start_transaction(SPI_CMD_RD, SPI_CSN0);
spi_read_fifo(&sensor_id, 8);
printf(" LPS25HB sensor id: 0x%x\n", sensor_id);
return 0;
}
Reviewing the signal with a logic a analizer I got this result: SCLK does as many clocks that spi_Reg_clkdiv value is, the chip select when CS is asserted, it remains asserted indefinitely. MOSI only does one pulse and MISO remains idle.
Anyone can help?
|
|
|
What is slm_conv-0.3 in HERO? |
Posted by: ajgaspar - 09-08-2023, 06:08 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (3)
|
|
I'm trying to build the HERO project, and I am on the step where I am meant to run " ../test/gen_slm_files.sh <app_name>."
However, I have an issue with line 11 of the file, which is
Code: slm_conv=~andkurt/bin/slm_conv-0.3
When I try running the command, I am told that the directory above does not exist. "~andkurt" is obviously the creator's home directory, but what is slm_conv-0.3 and how can I install it? There's nothing in the github repo mentioning it, and I haven't found it referenced anywhere else on the PULP platform. Even on google I haven't found a relevant result.
|
|
|
Occamy Verilator simulation error |
Posted by: pquanganh3105 - 06-14-2023, 03:24 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (2)
|
|
Dear sir,
I follow this instruction about Occamy: https://github.com/pulp-platform/snitch/...tem/occamy
However, when I ran command: make bin/occamy_top.vlt, I met this error:
%Error-PKGNODECL: occamy/snitch/hw/vendor/openhwgroup_cva6/core/include/ariane_rvfi_pkg.sv:20:17: Package/class 'riscv' not found, and needs to be predeclared (IEEE 1800-2017 26.3)
I recognize that your work-vlt/files lacks included file (it doesn't have snitch/hw/vendor/openhwgroup_cva6/core/include/riscv_pkg.sv so the simulator can not find package 'riscv') but whenever I ran the command above, work-vlt/files is automatically generated and it still remain lacking information.
How can fix that?
Many thanks
|
|
|
|