Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Fatal error: Broken assem...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Roogadget
Yesterday, 10:37 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 26
|
Pulp - make build
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Roogadget
10-25-2024, 07:33 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 44
|
CV32E40P/RI5CY Setup
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
10-25-2024, 07:13 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 112
|
mno pulp hwloop error
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Roogadget
10-25-2024, 07:03 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 154
|
How to get more detailed ...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: YiZhi_W
10-17-2024, 08:06 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 205
|
Which SDK to be used to c...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Tolido1
10-17-2024, 06:49 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,503
|
Difference between RI5CY ...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: eureka
09-27-2024, 06:17 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 364
|
Extension documentation a...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
08-14-2024, 05:04 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 893
|
Synthesis of ARA Vector U...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: Tanishq S
08-12-2024, 03:32 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 796
|
how can i occur fmadd ins...
Forum: PULP General questions
Last Post: kgf
08-05-2024, 10:35 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 497
|
|
|
Modify input image on MobileNet |
Posted by: zumair-19 - 10-22-2021, 11:21 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
Hello good members!
I've recently started working with pulp platform and ran MobileNet application available on both dory and pulp-sdk by following the instructions given on github. It was a successful test however i am not able to understand from where the input values are taken or generated and i wanted to modify the input image size and see the output. can anyone help me understand.
|
|
|
Distribution base_url display Packages config.repo repodata, expecting list of RPMs |
Posted by: janr7 - 08-13-2021, 08:50 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- No Replies
|
|
Hello
We are moving to pulp3 from pulp2 without the migration path. Setting all up in a container.
Using pulp/squeezer
Using the base_url from the created distribution, the web page displays three lines as below.
Inside Packages are directories [0-1a-z] and the packages are in there.
I was expecting a list of packages.
Are there a way to have the URL display the list of packages on one page?
Thanks so much.
base-url result:
{
"base_path": "SLE/SLES12/SP5/updates",
"base_url": "http://ltdkserverops05vm.group.net:8080/pulp/content/SLE/SLES12/SP5/updates/",
"content_guard": null,
"name": "SLES12-SP5-Updates",
"publication": "/pulp/api/v3/publications/rpm/rpm/f52e00bb-7344-4058-ab7e-a2893d64ce33/",
"pulp_created": "2021-08-13T08:08:57.970004Z",
"pulp_href": "/pulp/api/v3/distributions/rpm/rpm/72421ce2-611d-417b-bd65-49d5272f0cf7/",
"pulp_labels": {},
"repository": null
},
{
"versions": [
{
"component": "core",
"version": "3.14.4"
},
{
"component": "rpm",
"version": "3.14.0"
},
{
"component": "python",
"version": "3.4.0"
},
{
"component": "maven",
"version": "0.3.1"
},
{
"component": "file",
"version": "1.8.2"
},
{
"component": "deb",
"version": "2.14.1"
},
{
"component": "container",
"version": "2.8.0"
},
{
"component": "certguard",
"version": "1.5.0"
},
{
"component": "ansible",
"version": "0.9.0"
}
]
|
|
|
How to get in64_t working as well as C++ builds |
Posted by: Dom2231 - 06-30-2021, 01:57 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on my Master's thesis where I need to implement a software algorithm using 36 bit integers. My first approach was using the int64_t C type to represent my number. While it all worked fine on my local machine the algorithm broke in the Pulpissimo simulator.
After a while of debugging I figured out that the int64_t type does not work for me. To get started I modified `pulp-rt-examples/hello/test.c` to the code printed below, which is also a small example showing the issue that int64_t types always return the same value. I'm not sure whether this is a bug or I need to reconfigure something.
Do you have any idea how to solve this? Maybe I need to activate some compile flag or is there some 64-bit extension that I could easily add to the processor core?
I saw that the compiler does also support C++ so I wanted to give this a try but I couldn't find an example project to see how I can get the C++ compiler running. Simply changing the file extension from *.c to *.cpp did not work unfortunately.
Thank you very much
BR
Dominik
Code: #include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int main()
{
// Everything works when changing
// int64_t to int32_t
int64_t foo = 42;
// Prints 0 instead of 42
printf("\r\n%ld\r\n", foo);
return 0;
}
|
|
|
*OpenOCD compilation errors WITH SOLUTIONS* |
Posted by: LarsKeuninckx - 06-25-2021, 09:35 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- No Replies
|
|
Compiling OpenOCD (with gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0) as described in https://github.com/pulp-platform/pulpiss...l-platform, section "GDB and OpenOCD":
Code: source sourceme.sh && ./pulp-tools/bin/plpbuild checkout build --p openocd --stdout
This error was encountered:
Code: In function 'memset',
inlined from 'mg_gen_ataid' at src/flash/mflash.c:1162:2,
inlined from 'mg_storage_config' at src/flash/mflash.c:1174:2:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:71:10: error: '__builtin_memset' offset [509, 512] from the object at 'buff' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'reserved7' with type 'mg_io_uint8[186]' {aka 'unsigned char[186]'} at offset 322 [-Werror=array-bounds]
71 | return __builtin___memset_chk (__dest, __ch, __len, __bos0 (__dest));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Makefile:3344: src/flash/mflash.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/thom/Argus/pulpissimo/pulp-sdk/tools/riscv-openocd'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:4283: install-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/thom/Argus/pulpissimo/pulp-sdk/tools/riscv-openocd'
make: *** [Makefile:4585: install] Error 2
Reached EOF with exit status 2
FATAL ERROR: the command 'build' has failed
SOLUTION: see https://githubmemory.com/repo/STMicroele...OCD/issues, user nretro's comment:
Quote: In src/flash/mflash.h the line
Code: mg_io_uint8 reserved7[186];
Quote: should be changed to
Code: mg_io_uint8 reserved7[190];
Quote:This is obviously an error, since in mflash.c reserved7 is accessed using
memset(pSegIdDrvInfo->reserved7, 0x00, 190);
Current gcc compiler flags this with an out of bound warning. In combination with the "Werror" flag, the compilation will be aborted.
After fixing that error, this one appears:
Code: In file included from src/helper/options.c:38:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/sysctl.h:21:2: error: #warning "The <sys/sysctl.h> header is deprecated and will be removed." [-Werror=cpp]
21 | #warning "The <sys/sysctl.h> header is deprecated and will be removed."
| ^~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [Makefile:3359: src/helper/libhelper_la-options.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/thom/Argus/pulpissimo/pulp-sdk/tools/riscv-openocd'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:4283: install-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/thom/Argus/pulpissimo/pulp-sdk/tools/riscv-openocd'
make: *** [Makefile:4585: install] Error 2
Reached EOF with exit status 2
FATAL ERROR: the command 'build' has failed
SOLUTION: see https://github.com/rr-debugger/rr/commit...49d49cfe5d
Apply these changes to pulp-sdk/tools/riscv-openocd/src/helper/options.c:
Code: #if IS_DARWIN
#include <libproc.h>
#endif
#include <sys/syscall.h>
//#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H
//#include <sys/sysctl.h>
//#endif
#ifndef CTL_KERN
#define CTL_KERN 1
#endif
#ifndef KERN_RTSIGMAX
#define KERN_RTSIGMAX 33
#endif
(...)
char *path = malloc(PATH_MAX);
if (path == NULL)
break;
int mib[] = { CTL_KERN, KERN_PROC, KERN_PROC_PATHNAME, -1 };
size_t size = PATH_MAX;
if (syscall(RR__sysctl, mib, (u_int)ARRAY_SIZE(mib), path, &size, NULL, 0) != 0)
//if (sysctl(mib, (u_int)ARRAY_SIZE(mib), path, &size, NULL, 0) != 0)
break;
Posted here so you don't have to waste the time we did. After that, the compilation works. Good luck.
|
|
|
Pulpissimo porting to Zephyr RTOS |
Posted by: RiscV - 06-18-2021, 05:48 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hi team,
I am trying to run pulp-rt examples on the Zephyr platform, but I didn't find any documentation regarding this.
Is pulpissimo run on Zephyr RTOS? If pulp supports Zephyr, can you help me to find the documentation/steps? Your help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
RiscV
|
|
|
pulp optimization problem,not getting expected output. |
Posted by: pallavi@76 - 06-17-2021, 07:34 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
|project|loc_Bangalore|loc_Pune|cat_s|cat_c|
|:------|:-----------:|:------:|:---:| ---:|
|abc |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|Sys |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|Syst |0 |1 |1 |0 |
|EPS |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|foss |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|opc |0 |1 |1 |0 |
> want list of projects,which should satisfy below condition:
1. count of project related to loc_Bangalore <=3
2. count of project related to loc_pune <=2
3. count of project related to cat_c <=4
4. count of project related to cat_s <=1
5. total project selected <=5(final condition).
> whatever project will come in output it should fullfill all 5 condition.
I tried soe code:
but not getting expected result.
prob = LpProblem("choose project")
project_list = list(df['project'])
banglore = dict(zip(project_list,df['loc_Bangalore']))
pune = dict(zip(project_list,df['loc_Pune']))
c = dict(zip(project_list,df['cat_C']))
s = dict(zip(project_list,df['cat_S']))
proj_vars = pulp.LpVariable.dicts("project",project_list,cat='Binary')
no_of_project_choose = 5
prob += pulp.lpSum([banglore[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <= 3
prob += pulp.lpSum([pune[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <=2
prob += pulp.lpSum([c[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <=4
prob += pulp.lpSum([s[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <=1
prob += pulp.lpSum([[banglore[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]+[pune[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]+
[c[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]+[s[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]]) <=5
prob.solve()
> output: abc 0.0, sys 0.0, syst None, EPS 0.0 , foss 0.0 , opc
> None(i am getting all project with 0 or some number line abc 9)
Pls help me in solving this.I want only project which satisfy other condition also(like banglore, pune,c and s).
is there anyother way of solving this?
i m not sue about my solution and way of solving.plz help.
|
|
|
pulp optimization problem,not getting expected output. |
Posted by: pallavi@76 - 06-17-2021, 07:33 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
|project|loc_Bangalore|loc_Pune|cat_s|cat_c|
|:------|:-----------:|:------:|:---:| ---:|
|abc |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|Sys |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|Syst |0 |1 |1 |0 |
|EPS |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|foss |1 |0 |0 |1 |
|opc |0 |1 |1 |0 |
> want list of projects,which should satisfy below condition:
1. count of project related to loc_Bangalore <=3
2. count of project related to loc_pune <=2
3. count of project related to cat_c <=4
4. count of project related to cat_s <=1
5. total project selected <=5(final condition).
> whatever project will come in output it should fullfill all 5 condition.
I tried soe code:
but not getting expected result.
prob = LpProblem("choose project")
project_list = list(df['project'])
banglore = dict(zip(project_list,df['loc_Bangalore']))
pune = dict(zip(project_list,df['loc_Pune']))
c = dict(zip(project_list,df['cat_C']))
s = dict(zip(project_list,df['cat_S']))
proj_vars = pulp.LpVariable.dicts("project",project_list,cat='Binary')
no_of_project_choose = 5
prob += pulp.lpSum([banglore[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <= 3
prob += pulp.lpSum([pune[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <=2
prob += pulp.lpSum([c[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <=4
prob += pulp.lpSum([s[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]) <=1
prob += pulp.lpSum([[banglore[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]+[pune[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]+
[c[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]+[s[f] * proj_vars[f] for f in project_list]]) <=5
prob.solve()
> output: abc 0.0, sys 0.0, syst None, EPS 0.0 , foss 0.0 , opc
> None(i am getting all project with 0 or some number line abc 9)
Pls help me in solving this.I want only project which satisfy other condition also(like banglore, pune,c and s).
is there anyother way of solving this?
i m not sue about my solution and way of solving.plz help.
|
|
|
Tock OS on pulpissimo |
Posted by: cyberbemon - 05-31-2021, 02:28 PM - Forum: PULP General questions
- Replies (1)
|
|
I've been looking at porting Tock OS on to the pulp platform and mostly reading through the documentation. I'm fairly new to this whole thing, so I have few questions. According to the TockOS porting guide, I need to define the following in the linker file
Quote: For most developers, it should
* be sufficient to define {ROM/PROG/RAM}_{ORIGIN/LENGTH} (6 variables, the start and length for each),
* MPU_MIN_ALIGN (the minimum alignment granularity supported by the MPU) and PAGE_SIZE (the size of a flash page).
* If undefined, PAGE_SIZE uses the default value of 512 bytes.
Reading through the pulpissimo datasheet, I was unable to find those exact information, so I was wondering, can I use the Data Memory for PROG? and can I use the Boot ROM for ROM? I don't see anything related to MPU mentioned in the datasheet, so is that not supported for pulp platform?
Are there any other OS that runs on this platform?
|
|
|
Queries in FPU for cv32e40p |
Posted by: mlmram - 05-19-2021, 07:19 AM - Forum: PULP General questions
- No Replies
|
|
Hi,
I ran the cv32e40p (RI5CY) core with FPU (floating point) enabled and tried to check the result for all the floating-point operations. I have faced the following issues in case of division and fused operations. - Rounding mode output is incorrect for division, rounding mode for the division is not the same as addition, subtraction, and multiplication
For example, when rounding mode is RTZ (round to zero), the guard, round and sticky flags aren't ignored and the final output is changed by 1 bit.
- Exception status flags output is incorrect for division, exception status flags output for the division is not the same as addition, subtraction, and multiplication, and doesn't follow IEEE754
For example, the overflow flag is not generated even if the division result generated is infinity (for MAX/MIN case).
- Rounding mode output is incorrect for fused operations, rounding mode for fused operations is not the same as addition, subtraction, and multiplication
For example, when rounding mode is RTZ (round to zero), the guard, round and sticky flags aren't ignored and the final output is changed by 1 bit.
- Getting output as X in fused operations if any of the operands is 0
For example, If any of the 3 operands are 0 in FMA, the result generated by the core is X.
These are the inputs I have given. All the following data is for 32-bit FPU, input1, input2, input3, output, and the expected output are represented in {1-bit sign, 8-bit exponent, 23-bit mantissa}, and status and expected status are represented as {Invalid, Divide by Zero, Overflow, Underflow, Inexact}
Division:
Input1 - 1_10000010_11011100000100010010000
Input2 - 1_00000001_11110010110000000000000
Out - 0_11111111_00000000000000000000000
Expected out - 0_11111110_11111111111111111111111
Status - 00100
Expected status - 00001
Rounding mode - RTZ (Round to Zero)
Operation - Division
The Input1 is being divided with Inp2 which is a very large number, the result should overflow and give infinity as the output, but as the rounding mode is RTZ (round to zero), the output should be the maximum possible number in a 32-bit floating-point number instead of infinity.
Input1 - 0_00000000_00000000000000000000000
Input2 - 1_11111111_00000000000000000000000
Out - 1_00000000_00000000000000000000000
Expected out - 1_00000000_00000000000000000000000
Status - 00100
Expected status - 00000
Rounding mode - RTZ (Round to Zero)
Operation - Division
0/Inf is giving overflow status even though the output is not infinity
Input1 - 0_01111110_11100000000000000000000
Input2 - 0_01111111_00000000000000000000001
Out - 0_01111110_01111111111111111111111
Expected out - 0_01111110_01111111111111111111110
Status - 00001
Expected status - 00001
Rounding mode - RDN (Round Down)
Operation - Division
The expected data is 0_01111110_01111111111111111111110 but getting output as 0_01111110_01111111111111111111111, both the inputs are positive and the rounding mode is round down, so the output shouldn't be changing because of the rounding mode
Fused Multiply Add:
Input1 - 0_00000000_00000000000000000000000
Input2 - 0_00000000_00000000000000000000000
Input3 - 0_00100100_00101010011010100100100
Out - x_xxxxxxxx_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Expected out - 0_00100100_00101010011010100100100
Status - 000xx
Expected status - 00000
As input1 and input2 are 0, the output should be input3, but getting X from the core whenever any one of the inputs is 0 for fused operations.
Please let me know if these are the bugs in the core or the FPU, or if there's anything wrong with my understanding of floating-point operations.
|
|
|
|